Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own strength, and to act in unison with each other.
For instance, in a large republic, a corrupt delegate would need to bribe many more people in order to win an election than in a small republic. A strong national government, the Federalists argued, would prevent factions from taking control by forcing debate and compromise.
In a letter to Richard PriceBenjamin Rush noted that "Some of our enlightened men who begin to despair of a more complete union of the States in Congress have secretly proposed an Eastern, Middle, and Southern Confederacy, to be united by an alliance offensive and defensive".
As a general treatise on republican government, the Federalist papers are distinguished for their comprehensive analysis of the means by which the ideals of justicethe general welfare, and the rights of Federal paper 10 and 51 could be realized.
With pure democracy, he means a system in which every citizen votes directly for laws, and, with republic, he intends a society in which citizens elect a small body of representatives who then vote for laws.
Its powers come partly from federal and party from national elections House is national, Senate is federal, President is mixed. The amount of this argument striped of the abundant verbages with which the author has dressed it, is this: He wrote like Cesar; and had the commander in chief, and a few more officers of rank, countenanced the measure, the desperate resolution had been taken, to refuse to disband.
And the medium in which this give and take would occur would be politics, the art of governing.
Elected government officials should be controlled by a system of "checks and balances. Some opponents of the Constitution argued that the House ought to have special provisions to ensure that each class would be represented fairly.
Since the numerical majority is likely to resist the tyranny of the elite minority, the minority will have to construct an aggressive shock force outside society and politics to assault both society and politics.
In his book An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United StatesBeard argued that Madison produced a detailed explanation of the economic factors that lay behind the creation of the Constitution.
It is not enough merely to separate powers, as one branch would inevitably encroach on powers reserved to the others. They wanted a republic diverse enough to prevent faction but with enough commonality to maintain cohesion among the states.
By what means is this object attainable. On checks and balances. Individual Assignment President Reagan remarked that there should not be a limit on the number of times a person may serve as president.
Size permits the U. The state legislatures can, in no case, by law, resolution, or otherwise, of right, prevent or impede the general government, from enacting any law, or executing it, which this constitution authorizes them to enact or execute.
Here, federalism is not a complete solution, but it helps mightily. Although frequently interpreted as an attack on majority rule, the essay is in reality a defense of both social, economic, and cultural pluralism and of a composite majority formed by compromise and conciliation.
A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of Government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.
What could they do to protect property and the propertied from the threat?. The Federalist Papers are a series of 85 articles encouraging the ratification of the United States Constitution.
The Federalist Papers serve as a primary source for interpretation of the Constitution, as they outline the philosophy and motivation for the proposed system of government/5(). Sep 03, · The Federalist Papers were a collection of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison to argue for a strong central government rather than a government of the people run by many different michaelferrisjr.com: Resolved.
4. Engage students in a discussion based on the reading to determine if they understand the key ideas expressed the Federalist Papers and why it is considered so important. Questions to raise: • What was the Articles of Confederation? — Two instances have been mentioned in a former paper.
They are so remarkable, that they are worthy of the most careful attention of every lover of freedom. — They are taken from the history of the two most powerful nations that have ever existed in the world; and who are the most renowned, for the freedom they enjoyed, and the excellency.
Nov 26, · Of all the Federalist Papers written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, perhaps the most famous and the one most quoted is Federalist No.
10, by Madison. Study Questions for Federalist Number 10 By James Madison 1. What is a faction?
Why are factions a problem in government? 2. What are the two methods for curing the mischiefs of faction?Federal paper 10 and 51